10 Critical Issues Facing the Next Pope

Cardinals await a consistory of new cardinals in St Peter's Basilica, Dec. 7, 2024 (Edward Pentin photo).
Cardinals at a consistory of new cardinals in St Peter’s Basilica, Dec. 7, 2024 (Edward Pentin photo).

Pope Francis, who famously advocated “making a mess,” applied that maxim to his pontificate, making it highly disruptive, divisive and tumultuous.

The mess generated much understandable unease, consternation and, at times, disgust, especially as such a deliberate approach to governance has never been consistent with the Catholic faith, the common good, Divine Revelation, and the natural law.

However, the flipside was that, like stirring a pot, it brought plenty of what had lain hidden in the darkness to the surface.

And in so doing, it has the potential to equip the next pope with the information needed to set about rectifying, if he so wishes, the problems Francis’ pontificate exposed.

So what could be critical areas that the next pope needs to address? Here is a list of 10 possible priorities:

  1. Return to a Papacy as Source of Sound Doctrine and Unity

Although Pope Francis did much to try to bring the Church to the peripheries, the poor and the marginalized in an attempt to make her accessible to those who might not have given her a second glance, in doing so he often set aside doctrinal boundaries and canonical limits to papal power. He was also frequently criticized for departing from apostolic tradition, issuing statements that at least appeared to run contrary to established Church teaching — especially her moral teaching, and promoting indifferentism — the idea that all religions are valid paths to God. Together with a push towards synodality, in which uncatechized faithful had a significant say in a broad democratization of the Church, this led to doctrinal confusion in the Vatican and elsewhere, the Church in Germany being a prime example. Together with a failure to correct error and heresy, a trend that began before the Francis pontificate, the integrity of the faith has been undermined. An urgent priority for the next pope, therefore, will be to restore doctrinal clarity in faith and morals, good governance, and respect for canon law. Connected with this, the next pope will need to cease and root out the persecution and elimination of institutions, movements, bishops, clergy and laity who evidently bear good and ample fruits in terms of reverence, spiritual life, fidelity to Catholic doctrine, and vocations. He should allow any such persons or entities to grow and flourish rather than be cancelled — contrary to what often took place under Pope Francis where those who abused doctrine, moral teaching and the liturgy went unpunished and were allowed to thrive.

  1. Clarification of Vatican II, Reform of the Jesuits

Closely connected with the first critical issue is a need for the next pope to clear up ambiguities regarding the Second Vatican Council, or at least tackle this concern which has grown in recent years. The Council has long been interpreted in ways which many stress differ from those intended by the Council fathers, and this became especially apparent during Francis’ pontificate. The ambiguity has often been blamed on a lack of clarity in interpreting the teachings of the Council which have themselves often been criticized for not being clear enough. Part of this return to clarity of teaching could also entail some kind of reform of the Jesuit Order. In his Demos Memorandum, Cardinal George Pell called for such a reform given the prevailing heterodoxy in the Society of Jesus and catastrophic decline in terms of vocations to the Order. “The Jesuit charism and contribution have been and are so important to the Church that they should not be allowed to pass away into history undisturbed,” the memo said.

  1. Restore Traditional Papal Governance and Collegiality to the College of Bishops and Cardinals

Connected with papal power, the next pope will need to reassert greater collegiality with bishops and within the College of Cardinals. Due to a long-standing trend of centralization and overbearing bishops’ conference, the full realization of episcopal collegiality as envisioned by Vatican II has not taken place, and the autonomy and authority of bishops has been undermined. Regarding the College of Cardinals, in recent years and contrary to the stated wish for synodality, the majority of the cardinals with the exception of a few close aides, have been excluded from decision making, even though one of their principal roles is to act as advisers to the Pope. They also had few opportunities to meet because meetings of all cardinals during cardinal-making consistories were halted in 2014, also lessening the collegiality of the Sacred College. These factors led to a diminishment of the cardinals’ important role while excessive and unchecked power was placed in the hands of the Pope, contrary to the traditions of the past. This became so apparent under Pope Francis that observers said the papacy had become tyrannical with arbitrary exercises of power. The next pontiff will need to reaffirm what popes can and cannot do in accordance with apostolic tradition, and how much Magisterial weight should be placed on a pope’s various pronouncements — all significant topics of debate during Francis’ pontificate.

  1. More Reverence in the Liturgy

The divine liturgy is the “summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed” and the “font from which all her power flows,” said Sacrosanctum Concilium, the Second Vatican Council’s constitution on the liturgy. The liturgy also protects the Church against false teachings and inaccurate theology. Many, including Benedict XVI, have attributed today’s crisis in the Church largely to abuses of the liturgy that stemmed from the liturgical reforms of 1970, causing the Church to lose her Christocentric emphasis and replace it with a preference for entertainment that focuses on man rather than God. The next Pope will need to prioritize a return to more reverent worship by improving liturgical formation for both clergy and laity, prioritizing the supernatural (the purpose of the Church is supernatural), and emphasizing the First Commandment, the worship of God.

  1. End Suppression of the Traditional Liturgy

Connected with the need to overcome liturgical abuses is the need to address a tendency to suppress, and Francis’ clear suppression of, the Traditional Latin Mass — a decision which was widely viewed as unjust, opposed to previous papal teaching, contrary to divine law, and the opposite of what many believed the liturgy needed at this time: greater sacredness, less worldliness, and more Christ-centered reverence that reaffirmed the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. The next Pope will therefore have to ascertain how best to restore efforts, already begun by Pope Benedict XVI, in allowing the Church to draw on the riches of the increasingly popular Traditional liturgy while not endangering unity or exacerbating the “liturgy wars.”

  1. Distance from Globalism, Secularism and Ties to Government Funding

Over the past 60 years, and largely as a result of the Second Vatican Council’s directive to open the doors of the Church to the world, the Holy See and the wider Church has allied with governments in an effort to help the poor, vulnerable and the marginalized. But while this has born some good fruit, it has also sprouted thorns. Her closeness to political factions, globalism, and growing dependence on state funding has led, especially in recent years, to compromises being made with secular values leading to a muting the Church’s voice on key moral issues, and a consequent “flattening” of her evangelical witness. This was particularly visible when it came to allying with the previous Biden administration but also in the Vatican’s increasingly frequent collaboration with multinational groups whose values have been diametrically opposed to the Church’s key moral teachings. The next Pope will need to courageously distance the Church from such ideological groups, governments and temporal affairs, as well as issues on which it has little competence such as climate change, and secular values of “diversity” and “inclusion” that tend to only really apply to those who adhere to the same secularist ideology. His main task will be to bring the Church back to her main duty: serving as the Lord’s instrument for the salvation of souls and propagating the faith.

  1. Zero Tolerance on Clerical Sex Abuse

Pope Francis was elected on a mandate to tackle the sexual abuse crisis. He made some progress such as publishing the document Vos estis lux mundi that, although it contained weaknesses, aimed to make bishops more accountable. He also removed some bishops for covering up abuse. But a culture of secrecy remains and Francis himself repeatedly defended and protected offending bishops and high-ranking clerics, especially those to whom he was personally loyal (e.g. Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta, Father Marko Rupnik, Theodore McCarrick, and Bishop Juan Barros Madrid). A critical issue for the next Pope will be to ensure greater justice and consistency in dealing with the issue, taking the lead in tackling abuse and not covering up for friends.

  1. Homosexuality in the Church

Often called the “Pink Elephant in the Room,” the prevailing influence of those who maintain homosexuality is normal has been harmful. It has had a significant negative influence on her overall governance, ability to evangelize, and in attracting sound vocations. This attempt to normalize it within the Church, especially under Francis who had allied with groups that the Vatican had previously banned, has allowed cliques to grow, conspiracies of silence to worsen, and great injustices to be committed, not least in its thwarting of non-homosexual cardinals, bishops, priests and faithful from being heard and having a role in governing the Church. It has also left many homosexual clerics vulnerable to blackmail. The next Pope will have to work to at least identify problem areas, close down such homosexual groups, and show zero tolerance for incidents of homosexual practice in the priesthood and the Church hierarchy.

  1. Good Stewardship of Vatican Finances

Despite some well publicized setbacks, Pope Francis’ pontificate had some successes in financial reform that laid the groundwork for improved management, and greater transparency and accountability. But challenges remain and the next Pope will need to fully implement the structural reforms Francis began in 2014 by removing the changes of subsequent years that had watered down the effects of the reforms. He will also need to appoint qualified lay persons to enact the reforms and embark on a thorough restructuring, especially regarding APSA, as well as introduce independent bodies of control. The next pope will also be required to address unresolved problems such as the Sloane Avenue Property Scandal, allegations that Vatican funds were used to buy witnesses against Cardinal Pell in his trial to prevent him uncovering financial corruption in the Vatican, and the complaint of ex-Auditor General Libero Milone who is suing the Vatican for unlawful dismissal.

  1. Confront the Threat of Islam

Since the backlash against Pope Benedict XVI’s 2006 Regensburg Lecture, and especially during the Francis pontificate, the Vatican and the Church in general has beaten a retreat from tackling the threat of the spread of Islam in the West, preferring instead a policy of accommodation, dialogue on common issues, and an emphasis on fraternity but without Christ being mentioned or given clear prominence. This reached its pinnacle with Pope Francis’ Human Fraternity document and the Holy See’s support for such initiatives as the Abrahamic Family House. Such an approach often sidestepped such questions as persecution of Christians by Islamist groups or Muslim-majority governments and the importance of reciprocity when it comes to religious freedom. It has also prompted accusations of syncretism and indifferentism. The next pope will need to address these issues by, for example, stressing evangelization, providing clearer theological guidance to Islam, strengthening advocacy for persecuted Christians, and taking a firmer stand on reciprocity.

25 Comments

      • Action by implication has no teeth, no moral rudder. The Pope and the temporal Church he leads, must represent Christ–the only true Head of God’s Church on earth. Christ respected governments on earth (give to Caesar what is Caesar’s) but loathed government working in contrast to the Almighty. The unholy alliance between Francis and the Chinese Communist Party’s Chairman Xi must be ripped from the soil in which it was planted, root and branch. In my never humble opinion, that should have been Number One to keep the church from stepping in Number TWO!

    • I am the most concerned with point one, and its cousin, point eight. Point 10, Islam’s advancement, isn’t just about the spread of a religion, it is the conquering of territories and the people in them, by force if necessary; they proselytize with the sword.

  1. I’m the Director of the Prolife Pregnancy Resource Center in the US and we’re constantly under threat from vandals and hostile state laws. Our bishop and our Pope failed to support us or correct the Catholic politicians who threatened us.
    The Pontifical Academy for Life and the John Paul II Family Institute were infiltrated with pro-abortion clerics.
    This must be reversed!

  2. The agreement with the CCP must be made public and a new approach is needed as China is a country to focus on for conversions and for freedom. Secondly, focus on the younger folk. That is where more conversions will happen.

  3. This is an excellent list and reflects well the challenges facing the next Pope. My question is whether anyone has the ability (experience, tools, demeanor) to achieve success. This is a monumental task for a young man, let alone someone approaching 80 years old. Much prayer is necessary and, perhaps some divine intervention.

  4. We are our rites. This is confirmed in that you have two points on your list directly related to liturgy and its centrality to our faith. Some simple re-working of the Missal of Paul VI and making the GIRM actual instructions with less freedom in the name of pastoral sensitivity would go a long way to improving the reverence of the current liturgy.

  5. Peter Erdo seems like the best all round candidate to reform the Church; moreover, he can build bridges to our orthodox brethren in the East as we are in the most dangerous time since WW2 in regards to war with Russia. Furthermore, he has the type of brilliant canon law mind that is missing right now.

  6. FACT: In 10 OCTOBER 2013, Pope Francis granted a Parchment Decree of Marriage Blessing to a Filipino Gay Married couple living in Los Angeles, America. The blessing of Marriage was expressedly written, has the Vatican Dry Seal, was signed and delivered by the Archbishop of Poland, Krajewski accompanied with a personal letter from Pope Francis with a rosary and Marian medal. Only in 2023 did he publicize the blessing of Gay Couples.

  7. I regularly go to Mass where two male guitarists, thinking they are rockstars in front of an audience, stand in front, on the altar, facing the laity, strumming away during every hymn with loud voices and singing too fast for anyone to catch up. What happened to the sanctity and of Christ’s presence? What happened to the sacred space that is the altar? What happened to the Mass being “Actions focussed primarily on the priest”?

    Point 4 above – Return to reverence of the liturgy – says “The Church lost her Christocentric emphasis and replaced it with a preference for entertainment that focuses on man rather than God”

    Absolutely! Guitars in front, at the altar, facing the laity is exactly that! Entertainment!

  8. Excellent list of priorities and so well-written. Five things I would have added: (1) A review of whether the reforms contained in Praedicate Evangelium do anything to address the 10 priorities previously mentioned; (2) Strengthening the New Evangelization perhaps by clearly stating what it involves, i.e. the salvation of souls and the conversion of sinners, and/or institutionalizing it based on the traditional spiritual and corporal acts of mercy; (3) Reforming the concept of the local parish in light of the diminishing number of priestly and religious vocations, new forms of technology and communication, and the growing attractiveness of non-parish-based organizations as sources of formation and vocations; (4) Heeding the specific requests Our Lady has made at Fatima and at other apparitions worthy of belief; and (5) Working towards reunification with Orthodox brethren in time for 2054.

  9. A superb task list by Mr Pentin complemented by equally superb insights in the commentary. Very reflective.

  10. While all of the points are relevant, if the conclave itself was illegitimate (Romano Pontifici Eligendo, 1975) then the Papacy itself is at risk. The individual does not matter (though I have opinions). He is without moral authority if selected by subversion. As a Catholic, he cannot claim the mantle “Vicar of Christ” . . . the Church has lost its way.

  11. Thank you very much Mr. Pentin. Those of us living way out in the provinces need someone who can tell us honestly what is
    going on in the Church. You write with far more insight and clarity than we ever got from Pope Francis.

  12. Superb article.
    The Francis pontificate may well turn out to have been a blessing in disguise. Crooked lines and all that.

  13. Pentin leaves out divorce. God hates divorce (Malachia 3), but Francis was okay with the divorced and remarried receiving Holy Communion.

    American marriage tribunals are also okay with civil divorce. Everyone of them requires a couple to be civilly divorced before they will accept a petition for nullity.

    Then they proceed to grant a declaration of nullity based on lack of due discretion and/or psychological incapacities in 90% of cases.

    This scandal needs to stop before any other because without families, the Church has nothing. The family is everything.

  14. #12. Transparency. Reinstatement of Bishop Joseph E. Strickland of Tyler Texas or publish why he was de-flocked. The people of his diocese deserve to know why he was removed, and Bishop Strickland deserves to know why he was removed, if he doesn’t already. Last I read he stated that he has no idea, except that he was critical of Francis’ policies and decisions. Of course, Bishop Strickland has been virtually silent since November 29.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*